Last Updated on July 10, 2026 by Adrienne Mathis

On June 30, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision upholding laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit transgender girls and women from participating on girls’ and women’s school sports teams.

The laws define eligibility for girls’ and women’s teams based on biological sex and permit schools to maintain separate athletic teams for males and females on that basis. The Court held that these classifications do not violate Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause.

What the Supreme Court Decision Means for Title IX Professionals

The ruling does not create a nationwide standard for schools, nor does it settle the broader legal questions surrounding transgender students’ rights under Title IX.

For many colleges and universities, the immediate operational impact may be limited. Earlier this year, the NCAA revised its participation policy to prohibit transgender women from competing on women’s teams, and many institutions have already updated their athletic eligibility policies accordingly.

Institutions should consider:

  • Reviewing athletic eligibility policies to ensure they align with applicable state law, NCAA requirements, and institutional policy.
  • Updating, as needed, student-facing materials, athletics webpages, and internal guidance to reflect current athletic participation and eligibility policies.
  • Monitoring future legal and regulatory developments, as this decision is limited to school athletics and does not resolve broader Title IX questions involving transgender students.

For additional coverage of the decision, read this article from Inside Higher Ed.

Updating Your Title IX Policies?

Legal and regulatory changes can prompt a deeper review of your Title IX policies and procedures. Our team can help you update existing policies or develop new ones.

Our Title IX Policy Audit & Development services include a comprehensive review of your existing policies, practical recommendations, and customized policy updates aligned with current legal and regulatory requirements.

Learn about our Title IX Policy Audit & Development services →

     

    Please Note: The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and is not intended to be legal advice. We recommend seeking independent legal advice concerning the issues presented in evaluating a particular incident.

    Authors

    • Adrienne Mathis

      Adrienne Mathis is a partner at TIXS, where she helps university Title IX Coordinators navigate sexual harassment statutes and implement trauma-informed best practices. A former Fulbright Research Fellow, Adrienne previously drafted landmark sexual misconduct policies for Ecuador’s top university. Today, she specializes in policy audits, training program design, and safety strategies for U.S. students abroad. Her higher education insights have been featured in The Chronicle of Higher Education.

    • Susanna Murphy, JD

      Susanna Murphy is an independent Title IX advisor, investigator, and expert witness with over 20 years of criminal justice legal experience as a trial attorney and investigator. On behalf of Title IX Solutions, she provides comprehensive compliance training and misconduct prevention programming nationwide. Known for her objectivity, discretion, and trauma-informed approach, Susanna excels at navigating highly sensitive allegations while ensuring all parties and witnesses feel respected and comfortable.